Surely, there is something more? we can do better?

There must be something more!

I refuse to agree that all there is to being human is what we see around us.

Sometimes, as in the above picture, above, we may see glimpses of the joy and happiness that CAN exist in our world, with young and old of different races having fun without any self consciousness.

But this is only rarely so.

Around us is the most atrocious collection of villainy and stupidity that you can think of. Whatever evil is imaginable,  is already around us not as imagination,  but reality.

Cruelty not seen among animals, illogicallity,  stupidity, unwarranted wickedness, and oppression of the weak by the strong is what has become the lot of humanity,. Listen to the news on any of the major news networks- Al Jazeera,  CNN, CBS, BBC, etc, it's as if there is a conspiracy of psychological warfare among news channels.  You are bombarded with sad, sad news.

One wonders whether human existence is now one dark night of tragedy, killings, economic turmoil and religious brigandage.  Mere criminal who are hiding behind a very porous mask of religiosity are given free air time every time. Analysts invest more time on the warped thinking of these minions of darkness with their senseless killings by following the analysis template laid down by these outlaws. What clearly should be elucidated as a cancerous growth on the body of humanity is rationalized in endless talk shows, sometimes in esoteric language, blocking popular understanding.

International criminals who should be analyzed as mental cases are praised in psychology jargon as religious zealots.

This is the tragedy of modern man. Evil is moving apace from a minority, to overwhelm the majority, and the majority simply fold their arms and rationalize what has no reason to exist. It is rather like a doctor explaining to a cancer patient why the cancer cells should be tolerated, and their human rights ( or cell rights) should be respected. The truth in this analogy of course is that cancerous cells are no longer cells that they should be, and therefore lose any rights accrual to the cells they used to be.

Cancerous cells of the lung for instance are no longer lung cells. They may resemble lung cells, yes, since they started out being lung cells. But when they metastasize into cancer cells, they can no longer be correctly called lung cells. Consequently, it would be wrong to accord the same treatment given non cancerous lung cells to the monstrosity that lung cells that choose to be cancerous have become.

In same manner,  there are qualities associated with human beings, which has can not be extended ad infinitum.  Once a part of humanity displays such extreme behavior that is far away from what we usually associate with the human species, we should be bold enough to recognize the possible evolution of a malignant strain of what we know as humanity, and name appropriately,  this new strain. But then such new strain can not expect to be treated in exactly the same way  as the main strain from which it has exercised it's free will to strain away.

Public discourse are dictated by fringe groups. People who should be counseled have seized the public space, and have come round to accuse the sane majority of bias, and prejudice. To be politically correct, no one dare confront this filth. Thus we are simply rolling around inside a deep pit, where the fringe minority (who properly should be designated as an evolutionary curiosity and should be so treated), are having fun, while the majority are suffering in silence.

This should change.

 For instance, those who make extreme choices should be rejcognized as starting a new subspecies of humanity and should be so treated, not to accede to their presumptuous demand to be regarded as a part of existing especially,  and then go further to impose their newly acquired evolutionary characteristics  on all.

same sex marriage for instance is likely to put a tidy end to humanity as we know it.  Such a strain of character, while evolutionarily possible, and perhaps permissible, is not sustainable. It is not a positive attribute of the species that can  r r courage,  much less allowed to become the mainstream.

Today, mankind has allowed himself to be duped into mainstreaming the thought that anyone opposing anything, no matter how evil that thing may be, is some kind of nut, intolerant, and conservative.  Thus. The few who do not want to take responsibility for their sexual recklessness advocate loudly, abortion, calling it pro choice.  (A more ironic name can hardly be found:, for where is the choice of the Human being whose dream of experiencing incarnate life is thus cut short by abortion without consultation?).

Those who allowed their imagination master them to engage in what is clearly unnatural tendencies tricked the rest of us by calling it alternative love, and browbeat the rest of us into submission.  Anyone opposing same sex interactions is now called a prude and intolerant. Now, the highest court in the supposedly most civilized country in the world has now redefined marriage such that it can mean a number of things, or relationship; not just the one we used to know as a union between a man and a woman.

What is more, the government of the Western world now feel compelled to deploy all their powers to spread this gospel (?) Of evil around the world, using threats of economic cruelty.

What are we coming to? Where will humanity end up? Will things ever stop on this downward slope? Surely , our sad story of past millenia, full as it is of wars, pestilences,  wanton killings by the empire builders, both ancient ( like Alexander,  Julius Caesar), and modern (Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin), inhuman cruelty and selfishness that peaked in the Atlantic slave trade, followed by violent colonization,  neo colonialism etc... is this all mankind has to offer with all his intelligence?

I should think not. We can do better. The sentient being that can put a man on the moon  can do better. The intelligent being that can defy gravity and  fly man and beast in ever more sophisticated airplanes can do better. The creature that created the computer can do better.

How? We must return to our roots. What are we? A breathing physical machine,  or a spirit being using a physical body? From the researches done and published in books like Life after life, Life after Death, Life beyond Life, etc, the evidence seem overwhelming that we are more than our physical structure.

To reach our true potential therefore, we must think like the executive creatures that we are, and not a mere mistake of evolution condemned to come into existence, blunder around the planet for a few million years and then disappear from the scene like the dinosaurs. We have a more glorious purpose than the evolutionary creatures that gave rise to our physical vehicle.

We must find our original  purpose, and live it. We are beings of virtue and love who should transform our planet into a place of joy with love in all our actions.  Unlike what is thought today, concepts have meanings, and meanings that are NOT subject to change by definition of anyone. Same sex unions, just as an example, is NOT marriage, it has nothing to do with marriage as a concept. What the US Supreme Court should have done for instance should have been to give same sex unions an entirely new name, created solely for this new kind of experience, and also define it's limits and functions. But not to debase the meaning of an existing word by twisting it's meaning to now include a new concept.

Very sad way of doing things. If same sex unions have been given an entirely new name, as it should, then, the US National Assembly would then set to work creating a set of rules that would guide the people engaged in it among themselves, as they should relate to others, and what rights they can enjoy from the government.  To forcibly subsume a strange practice under an existing legitimate  practice smacks of forgery, and intellectual fraud. If you create a new kind of experience, you must give it a new name, not look around for which concept to steal and debase. It's a form of identity theft!

Man must wake up, and claim his heritage, and sieze his thinking, and therefore his actions from the presently vocal and oppressive minority.